From 174aef6ea8abc5176d681ea9706db9b235893aee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ryan Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:29:06 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] andrew edits to README --- slanted-maps/README.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/slanted-maps/README.md b/slanted-maps/README.md index 728f829..e329179 100644 --- a/slanted-maps/README.md +++ b/slanted-maps/README.md @@ -12,18 +12,18 @@ Header | Definition `rep_map_c_districts` | Number of highly competitive districts in the most Republican-favored proposed map. `rep_map_avg_r_chances` | Mean of Republicans' odds of winning each district in the most Republican-favored proposed map. `rep_map_avg_d_chances` | Mean of Democrats' odds of winning each district in the most Republican-favored proposed map. -`rep_map_median_pvi` | Difference between the partisan lean of the most Republican-favored proposed map’s median district and the state as a whole. Values more favorable to Democrats are coded as positive; values more favorable to Republicans are coded as negative. +`rep_map_median_pvi` | Difference between the partisan lean of the most Republican-favored proposed map’s median district and the partisan lean of the state as a whole. Values more favorable to Democrats are coded as positive; values more favorable to Republicans are coded as negative. `dem_map` | Link to the most Democratic-favorable map proposed in the 2020 census redistricting cycle in this state, as analyzed in [FiveThirtyEight's Redistricting Tracker](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-2022-maps/). `dem_map_r_districts` | Number of Republican-leaning districts in the most Democratic-favored proposed map. `dem_map_d_districts` | Number of Democratic-leaning districts in the most Democratic-favored proposed map. `dem_map_c_districts` | Number of highly competitive districts in the most Democratic-favored proposed map. `dem_map_avg_r_chances` | Mean of Republicans' odds of winning each district in the most Democratic-favored proposed map. `dem_map_avg_d_chances` | Mean of Democrats' odds of winning each district in the most Democratic-favored proposed map. -`dem_map_median_pvi` | Difference between the partisan lean of the most Democratic-favored proposed map’s median district and the state as a whole. Values more favorable to Democrats are coded as positive; values more favorable to Republicans are coded as negative. +`dem_map_median_pvi` | Difference between the partisan lean of the most Democratic-favored proposed map’s median district and the partisan lean of the state as a whole. Values more favorable to Democrats are coded as positive; values more favorable to Republicans are coded as negative. `com_map` | Link to the most competitive map proposed in the 2020 census redistricting cycle in this state, as analyzed in [FiveThirtyEight's Redistricting Tracker](https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-2022-maps/). `com_map_r_districts` | Number of Republican-leaning districts in the most competitive proposed map. `com_map_d_districts` | Number of Democratic-leaning districts in the most competitive proposed map. `com_map_c_districts` | Number of highly competitive districts in the most competitive proposed map. `com_map_avg_r_chances` | Mean of Republicans' odds of winning each district in the most competitive proposed map. `com_map_avg_d_chances` | Mean of Democrats' odds of winning each district in the most competitive proposed map. -`com_map_median_pvi` | Difference between the partisan lean of the most competitive proposed map’s median district and the state as a whole. Values more favorable to Democrats are coded as positive; values more favorable to Republicans are coded as negative. +`com_map_median_pvi` | Difference between the partisan lean of the most competitive proposed map’s median district and the partisan lean of the state as a whole. Values more favorable to Democrats are coded as positive; values more favorable to Republicans are coded as negative.