mirror of
https://github.com/opentffoundation/opentf.git
synced 2025-12-25 01:00:16 -05:00
providers.Interface: rename ValidateDataSourceConfig to ValidateDataResourceConfig (#27874)
* providers.Interface: rename ValidateDataSourceConfig to ValidateDataResourceConfig This PR came about after renaming ValidateResourceTypeConfig to ValidateResourceConfig: I now understand that we'd called it the former instead of the latter to indicate that the function wasn't necessarily operating on a resource that actually exists. A possibly-more-accurate renaming of both functions might then be ValidateManagedResourceConfig and ValidateDataResourceConfig. The next commit will update the protocol (v6 only) as well; these are in separate commits for reviewers and will get squashed together before merging. * extend renaming to protov6
This commit is contained in:
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ service Provider {
|
||||
rpc GetProviderSchema(GetProviderSchema.Request) returns (GetProviderSchema.Response);
|
||||
rpc ValidateProviderConfig(ValidateProviderConfig.Request) returns (ValidateProviderConfig.Response);
|
||||
rpc ValidateResourceConfig(ValidateResourceConfig.Request) returns (ValidateResourceConfig.Response);
|
||||
rpc ValidateDataSourceConfig(ValidateDataSourceConfig.Request) returns (ValidateDataSourceConfig.Response);
|
||||
rpc ValidateDataResourceConfig(ValidateDataResourceConfig.Request) returns (ValidateDataResourceConfig.Response);
|
||||
rpc UpgradeResourceState(UpgradeResourceState.Request) returns (UpgradeResourceState.Response);
|
||||
|
||||
//////// One-time initialization, called before other functions below
|
||||
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ message ValidateResourceConfig {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
message ValidateDataSourceConfig {
|
||||
message ValidateDataResourceConfig {
|
||||
message Request {
|
||||
string type_name = 1;
|
||||
DynamicValue config = 2;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user