* Rename module name from "github.com/hashicorp/terraform" to "github.com/placeholderplaceholderplaceholder/opentf".
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Gofmt.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Regenerate protobuf.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Fix comments.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Undo issue and pull request link changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Undo comment changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Fix comment.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Undo some link changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* make generate && make protobuf
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
---------
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
One funny bit: We need to know the ViewType at the point where we ask the Cloud
backend for the plan JSON, because we need to switch between two distinctly
different formats for human show vs. `show -json`. I chose to pass that by
stashing it on the command struct; passing it as an argument would also work,
but one, the argument lists in these nested method calls were getting a little
unwieldy, and two, many of these functions had to be receiver methods anyway in
order to call methods on Meta.
This commit replaces the existing jsonformat.PlanRendererOpt type with a new
type with identical semantics, located in the plans package.
We needed to be able to exchange the facts represented by
`jsonformat.PlanRendererOpt` across some package boundaries, but the jsonformat
package is implicated in too many dependency chains to be safe for that purpose!
So, we had to make a new one. The plans package seems safe to import from all
the places that must emit or accept this info, and already contains plans.Mode,
which is effectively a sibling of this type.
* [testing framework] prepare for beta phase of development
* [Testing Framework] Add module block to test run blocks
* [testing framework] allow tests to define and override providers
* testing framework: introduce interrupts for stopping tests
* remove panic handling, will do it properly later
* command: keep our promises
* remove some nil config checks
Remove some of the safety checks that ensure plan nodes have config attached at the appropriate time.
* add GeneratedConfig to plan changes objects
Add a new GeneratedConfig field alongside Importing in plan changes.
* add config generation package
The genconfig package implements HCL config generation from provider state values.
Thanks to @mildwonkey whose implementation of terraform add is the basis for this package.
* generate config during plan
If a resource is being imported and does not already have config, attempt to generate that config during planning. The config is generated from the state as an HCL string, and then parsed back into an hcl.Body to attach to the plan graph node.
The generated config string is attached to the change emitted by the plan.
* complete config generation prototype, and add tests
* Plannable import: Add generated config to json and human-readable plan output
---------
Co-authored-by: Katy Moe <katy@katy.moe>
* [plannable import] embed the resource id within the changes
* [Plannable Import] Implement streamed logs for -json plan
* use latest structs
* remove implementation plans from TODO
* Add support for scoped resources
* refactor existing checks addrs and add check block addr
* Add configuration for check blocks
* introduce check blocks into the terraform node and transform graph
* address comments
* address comments
* don't execute checks during destroy operations
* don't even include check nodes for destroy operations
* Add viewType to Meta object and use it at the call sites
* Assign viewType passed from flags to state-locking cli commands
* Remove temp files
* Set correct mode for statelocker depending on json flag passed to commands
* Add StateLocker interface conformation check for StateLockerJSON
* Remove empty line at end of comment
* Pass correct ViewType to StateLocker from Backend call chain
* Pass viewType to backend migration and initialization functions
* Remove json processing info in process comment
* Restore documentation style of backendMigrateOpts
* Use the new structured renderer in place of the old diffs package
* remove old plan tests
* refresh only plans should show moved resources in the refresh section
This is a prototype of how the CLI layer might make use of Terraform
Core's ability to produce a partial plan if it encounters an error during
planning, with two new situations:
- When using local CLI workflow, Terraform will show the partial plan
before showing any errors.
- "terraform plan" has a new option -always-out=..., which is similar to
the existing -out=... but additionally instructs Terraform to produce
a plan file even if the plan is incomplete due to errors. This means
that the plan can still be inspected by external UI implementations.
This is just a prototype to explore how these parts might fit together.
It's not a complete implementation and so should not be shipped. In
particular, it doesn't include any mention of a plan being incomplete in
the "terraform show -json" output or in the "terraform plan -json" output,
both of which would be required for a complete solution.
Add a new ChangeReason, ReasonDeleteBecauseNoMoveTarget, to provide better
information in cases where a planned deletion is due to moving a resource to
a target not in configuration.
Consider a case in which a resource instance exists in state at address A, and
the user adds a moved block to move A to address B. Whether by the user's
intention or not, address B does not exist in configuration.
Terraform combines the move from A to B, and the lack of configuration for B,
into a single delete action for the (previously nonexistent) entity B.
Prior to this commit, the Terraform plan will report that resource B will be
destroyed because it does not exist in configuration, without explicitly
connecting this to the move.
This commit provides the user an additional clue as to what has happened, in a
case in which Terraform has elided a user's action and inaction into one
potentially destructive change.
Previously we tried to early-exit before doing anything at all for any
no-op changes, but that means we also skip some ancillary steps like
evaluating any preconditions/postconditions.
Now we'll skip only the main action itself for plans.NoOp, and still run
through all of the other side-steps.
Since one of those other steps is emitting events through the hooks
interface, this means that now no-op actions are visible to hooks, whereas
before we always filtered them out before calling. I therefore added some
additional logic to the hooks to filter them out at the UI layer instead;
the decision for whether or not to report that we visited a particular
object and found no action required seems defensible as a UI-level concern
anyway.
By observing the sorts of questions people ask in the community, and the
ways they ask them, we've inferred that various different people have been
confused by Terraform reporting that a value won't be known until apply
or that a value is sensitive as part of an error message when that message
doesn't actually relate to the known-ness and sensitivity of any value.
Quite reasonably, someone who sees Terraform discussing an unfamiliar
concept like unknown values can assume that it must be somehow relevant to
the problem being discussed, and so in that sense Terraform's current
error messages are giving "too much information": information that isn't
actually helpful in understanding the problem being described, and in the
worst case is a distraction from understanding the problem being described.
With that in mind then, here we introduce an explicit annotation on
diagnostic objects that are directly talking about unknown values or
sensitive values, and then the diagnostic renderer will react to that to
avoid using the terminology "known only after apply" or "sensitive" in the
generated diagnostic annotations unless we're rendering a message that is
explicitly related to one of those topics.
This ends up being a bit of a cross-cutting concern because the code that
generates these diagnostics and the code that renders them are in separate
packages and are not directly aware of each other. With that in mind, the
logic for actually deciding for a particular diagnostic whether it's
flagged in one of these special ways lives inside the tfdiags package as
an intermediation point, which both the diagnostic generator (in the core
package) and the diagnostic renderer can both depend on.
When an error occurs in a function call, the error message text often
includes references to particular parameters in the function signature.
This commit improves that reporting by also including a summary of the
full function signature as part of the diagnostic context in that case,
so a reader can see which parameter is which given that function
arguments are always assigned positionally and so the parameter names
do not appear in the caller's source code.
We have two different reasons why a data resource might be read only
during apply, rather than during planning as usual: the configuration
contains unknown values, or the data resource as a whole depends on a
managed resource which itself has a change pending.
However, we didn't previously distinguish these two in a way that allowed
the UI to describe the difference, and so we confusingly reported both
as "config refers to values not yet known", which in turn led to a number
of reasonable questions about why Terraform was claiming that but then
immediately below showing the configuration entirely known.
Now we'll use our existing "ActionReason" mechanism to tell the UI layer
which of the two reasons applies to a particular data resource instance.
The "dependency pending" situation tends to happen in conjunction with
"config unknown", so we'll prefer to refer that the configuration is
unknown if both are true.
