This doesn't actually work yet because the main implementation functions
are not written, but this is a sketch of the general layout of things that
the lang/eval package was designed to support: the planning phase first
lets lang/eval drive based on the desired state it discovers gradually in
the configuration, but afterwards it then does followup work for any
resource instances that didn't appear in the desired state but yet are
present in the previous round state.
This overall structure should allow the planning engine to discover all
of the changes that need to be made to resource instances without any
direct knowledge of how the OpenTofu language works and how the module
author chose to describe the desired state as code.
Signed-off-by: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
* Rename module name from "github.com/hashicorp/terraform" to "github.com/placeholderplaceholderplaceholder/opentf".
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Gofmt.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Regenerate protobuf.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Fix comments.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Undo issue and pull request link changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Undo comment changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Fix comment.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* Undo some link changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
* make generate && make protobuf
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
---------
Signed-off-by: Jakub Martin <kubam@spacelift.io>
IsFullDestroy was a workaround during apply to detect when the change
set was created by a destroy plan. This no longer works correctly, and
we need to fall back to the UIMode set in the plan.
We previously had a special case in the graph transformer for output
values where it would directly create an individual output value node
instead of an "expand" node as we would do for output values in nested
modules.
While it's true that we do always know that expanding a root module
output value will always produce exactly one instance, treating this case
as special creates the risk of those two codepaths diverging in other
ways.
Instead, we'll let the expand node also deal with root modules and
minimize the special case only to how we look up any changes for the
output values, since the design of plans.Changes is a bit awkward and
requires us to ask the question differently for root module output values.
Otherwise, the behavior will now be consistent across all output values
regardless of module.
The raw plan output changes were stored in the output exec node, when
they should have instead been fetch lazily through the context via the
synchronized ChangesSync value.
replace_triggered_by references are scoped to the current module, so we
need to filter changes for the current module instance. Rather than
creating a ConfigResource and filtering the result, make a
Changes.InstancesForAbsResource method to get only the AbsResource
changes.
This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library
package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for
internal use within Terraform only.
If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an
external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim
solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some
other way.
This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library
package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for
internal use within Terraform only.
If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an
external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim
solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some
other way.
