We previously already did some partial skipping of provider reference
validation when there are modules in the tree that failed to load, but we
were still running the main logic that checks whether the providers passed
between module boundaries are consistent.
Because that validation involves checking consistency between different
modules it will tend to generate spurious errors when run against a
partially-loaded module tree. Therefore we must also skip the other
validation steps whenever at least one module failed to load, so that the
reported diagnostics will only describe the problem loading the module and
not produce additional misleading reports describing downstream problems
caused by a module's content being incomplete due to those errors.
This one is kinda awkward to write a test for because it's a very specific
interaction that seems unlikely to arise again, but just to have _some_
representation of this historical problem I wrote a simple test that
intentionally makes one module fail to load and then tests that the result
only contains the diagnostic related to that intentional failure. Before
this fix that test would fail because of the spurious additional errors
produced by the functions we're now skipping.
Signed-off-by: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
Previously, the source snippet was only showing the last defined
meta-argument. To have a better context of which meta-arguments
are being used, we start to show from the first one defined
until the last one.
Signed-off-by: Diogenes Fernandes <diofeher@gmail.com>
This generalizes the previously-added lint-like check for when an object
constructor is used to define an input variable and it contains a
definition for an attribute that isn't part of the target type, so that
now it also works for various nested structures that commonly arise in
real-world configurations.
Because this is now considerably more complicated I factored it out into
a new package called "lint" which could potentially grow to include other
similar "technically valid but probably a mistake" situations in future,
but for now it just introduced an opportunity to produce similar warning
messages for ignored attribute definitions in the default value for an
input variable.
It seems to me that there is actually no useful reason to include an
unexpected attribute definition in either of these two cases: that
attribute will never appear as part of any expression that any other part
of the configuration can use. Therefore I considered making these be
treated as errors rather than warnings, but turning something that was
previously valid into an error is risky so I'm suggesting that we start
with these as warnings and then consider upgrading them to errors in a
later release if we don't hear of anyone reporting a false-positive that
was _somehow_ actually useful. (I find that very unlikely, but still...)
Signed-off-by: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
* [testing framework] prepare for beta phase of development
* [Testing Framework] Add module block to test run blocks
* [testing framework] allow tests to define and override providers
* command: keep our promises
* remove some nil config checks
Remove some of the safety checks that ensure plan nodes have config attached at the appropriate time.
* add GeneratedConfig to plan changes objects
Add a new GeneratedConfig field alongside Importing in plan changes.
* add config generation package
The genconfig package implements HCL config generation from provider state values.
Thanks to @mildwonkey whose implementation of terraform add is the basis for this package.
* generate config during plan
If a resource is being imported and does not already have config, attempt to generate that config during planning. The config is generated from the state as an HCL string, and then parsed back into an hcl.Body to attach to the plan graph node.
The generated config string is attached to the change emitted by the plan.
* complete config generation prototype, and add tests
* plannable import: add a provider argument to the import block
* Update internal/configs/config.go
Co-authored-by: kmoe <5575356+kmoe@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update internal/configs/config.go
Co-authored-by: kmoe <5575356+kmoe@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update internal/configs/config.go
Co-authored-by: kmoe <5575356+kmoe@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix formatting and tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Katy Moe <katy@katy.moe>
Co-authored-by: kmoe <5575356+kmoe@users.noreply.github.com>
* command: keep our promises
* remove some nil config checks
Remove some of the safety checks that ensure plan nodes have config attached at the appropriate time.
* add GeneratedConfig to plan changes objects
Add a new GeneratedConfig field alongside Importing in plan changes.
* add config generation package
The genconfig package implements HCL config generation from provider state values.
Thanks to @mildwonkey whose implementation of terraform add is the basis for this package.
* generate config during plan
If a resource is being imported and does not already have config, attempt to generate that config during planning. The config is generated from the state as an HCL string, and then parsed back into an hcl.Body to attach to the plan graph node.
The generated config string is attached to the change emitted by the plan.
* complete config generation prototype, and add tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Katy Moe <katy@katy.moe>
