Files
Martin Atkins 7fbfabc8ae Make the "Top-Ranking Issues" issue a little more concise
The main motivation here is that we now use PRs rather than issues to
represent RFCs that have not yet been approved, and so the ranking of
issues labeled "rfc" was misleading to include. All of the issues that
were labeled "rfc" that were not "RFC Tracker" issues under our newer
process are also labeled as "enhancement" so they will be included under
the "Top Enhancements" ranking.

While I was tweaking this anyway I also added a short note to the top
explaining how these rankings are generated and removed some of the
visual clutter from the suffixes of the individual list items, which
tended to get wrapped oddly for issues with longer titles.

Finally, the "script" is tweaked a little to do its API requests
anonymously when GITHUB_TOKEN isn't set, which makes it easier to test
locally without accidentally clobbering any real issues (since anonymous
requests cannot modify anything). To _actually_ test this locally I
temporarily made it print its output to stdout, but that particular part
is removed for the final submission.

Signed-off-by: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
2025-07-30 07:57:03 -07:00
..