mirror of
https://github.com/opentffoundation/opentf.git
synced 2026-02-28 23:01:32 -05:00
Reference: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/27459 Reference: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/27507 This follows the change in the plan command to move the development overrides warning above other output from the command that may exhibit unexpected behavior.
89 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
89 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
package e2etest
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"io/ioutil"
|
|
"os"
|
|
"path/filepath"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/e2e"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestProviderDevOverrides is a test for the special dev_overrides setting
|
|
// in the provider_installation section of the CLI configuration file, which
|
|
// is our current answer to smoothing provider development by allowing
|
|
// developers to opt out of the version number and checksum verification
|
|
// we normally do, so they can just overwrite the same local executable
|
|
// in-place to iterate faster.
|
|
func TestProviderDevOverrides(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
tf := e2e.NewBinary(terraformBin, "testdata/provider-dev-override")
|
|
defer tf.Close()
|
|
|
|
// In order to do a decent end-to-end test for this case we will need a
|
|
// real enough provider plugin to try to run and make sure we are able
|
|
// to actually run it. For now we'll use the "test" provider for that,
|
|
// because it happens to be in this repository and therefore allows
|
|
// us to avoid drawing in anything external, but we might revisit this
|
|
// strategy in future if other needs cause us to evolve the test
|
|
// provider in a way that makes it less suitable for this particular test,
|
|
// such as if it stops being buildable into an independent executable.
|
|
providerExeDir := filepath.Join(tf.WorkDir(), "pkgdir")
|
|
providerExePrefix := filepath.Join(providerExeDir, "terraform-provider-test_")
|
|
providerExe := e2e.GoBuild("github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/provider-simple/main", providerExePrefix)
|
|
t.Logf("temporary provider executable is %s", providerExe)
|
|
|
|
err := ioutil.WriteFile(filepath.Join(tf.WorkDir(), "dev.tfrc"), []byte(fmt.Sprintf(`
|
|
provider_installation {
|
|
dev_overrides {
|
|
"example.com/test/test" = %q
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`, providerExeDir)), os.ModePerm)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tf.AddEnv("TF_CLI_CONFIG_FILE=dev.tfrc")
|
|
|
|
stdout, stderr, err := tf.Run("providers")
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %s\n%s", err, stderr)
|
|
}
|
|
if got, want := stdout, `provider[example.com/test/test]`; !strings.Contains(got, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("configuration should depend on %s, but doesn't\n%s", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: We're intentionally not running "terraform init" here, because
|
|
// dev overrides are always ready to use and don't need any special action
|
|
// to "install" them. This test is mimicking the a happy path of going
|
|
// directly from "go build" to validate/plan/apply without interacting
|
|
// with any registries, mirrors, lock files, etc. To verify "terraform
|
|
// init" does actually show a warning, that behavior is tested at the end.
|
|
stdout, stderr, err = tf.Run("validate")
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %s\n%s", err, stderr)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got, want := stdout, `The configuration is valid, but`; !strings.Contains(got, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("stdout doesn't include the success message\nwant: %s\n%s", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
if got, want := stdout, `Provider development overrides are in effect`; !strings.Contains(got, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("stdout doesn't include the warning about development overrides\nwant: %s\n%s", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
stdout, stderr, err = tf.Run("init")
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("expected error: Failed to query available provider packages")
|
|
}
|
|
if got, want := stdout, `Provider development overrides are in effect`; !strings.Contains(got, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("stdout doesn't include the warning about development overrides\nwant: %s\n%s", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
if got, want := stderr, `Failed to query available provider packages`; !strings.Contains(got, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("stderr doesn't include the error about listing unavailable development provider\nwant: %s\n%s", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|